Friday, June 24, 2011

Parashas Korach

In this week’s parashah, we find that following Korach’s uprising, the Jews attacked Moshe and Aharon, accusing them of complicity in the deaths of Korach and his followers. Hashem responded to this by bringing a plague that wiped out some 14,700 people. (This is itself a fascinating topic for discussion, but not this week.)

Hashem then commands Moshe: Take 12 staffs, one staff from the prince of each Tribe – including a staff from Aharon for the Tribe of Levi – write the name of each Prince on his staff, and place the staffs in the Mishkan overnight. וְהָיָה הָאִישׁ אֲשֶׁר אֶבְחַר בּוֹ מַטֵּהוּ יִפְרָח וַהֲשִׁכֹּתִי מֵעָלַי אֶת תְּלֻנּוֹת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל אֲשֶׁר הֵם מַלִּינִם עֲלֵיכֶם, And it will be that the man who I will choose, his staff will bloom, and I will remove from Myself the complaints of the Children of Israel that they are complaining about you.

First, if Hashem wanted to offer a definitive sign that He had chosen Aharon to be the Kohen gadol, why would the flowering staff be more effective than Hashem’s having miraculously decimated Korach and the subsequent malcontents?

Furthermore, what is meant by the curious phrase “I will remove from Myself the complaints…”? If they were unhappy that He chose Aharon as Kohen, why would this miracle remove that complaint against Hashem?

And, if Hashem’s purpose in performing this miracle was to impress the nation, why were the staffs not left out in the open, so that everyone could see the great event unfold before their eyes?

Simply, we can understand that the episode of Korach had the potential to be quickly forgotten. Since the staff was placed back into the Mishkan as a permanent physical reminder of Aharon’s having been chosen, it served as an ongoing sign to the Jews of Hashem’s having picked Aharon.

As for the second question, we find that when the Jews complained about Moshe, Hashem considered it as though they rebelled against Him (see Sanhedrin 110a). Thus, Hashem was saying that he wanted to fend off further challenges against the legitimacy of Aharon as Kohen Gadol.

Perhaps there is another way to understand this episode, however:

The nation’s complaint was that Moshe was the Leader and Aharon was the Kohen.

Initially, at the time of Korach’s insurrection, they asserted that these positions were not taken legitimately. Hashem’s Presence and His miracles proved that He had, indeed, appointed them to these roles.

Their complaint now became one against Hashem: Why did you give us nothing?!

Hashem’s response was: That isn’t true.

Everyone person and each Tribe has a role. Aharon’s is in the Mishkan, and yours is where I placed you.

As proof, I’ll have Moshe take the staffs of all the Tribes and place them inside the Mishkan, the Machaneh Kehunah, the camp of the Kohanim. What happens? Only Aharon’s staff blooms. That is the place he has to fulfill his role as part of Klal Yisrael.

But part of the message was that in order to bloom, Aharon’s staff had to be there. Perhaps if the staffs would have been left elsewhere, it would not have been Aharon’s staff that blossomed, but that of the Tribe in whose territory it was left.

The message Hashem was sending was not only that Aharon was chosen as Kohen, but that Aharon was chosen only as Kohen (see Rashi 17:25); everyone else had their own role to play. This being the case, Hashem was removing from Himself the complaints of the Children of Israel that they had been disenfranchised by Hashem’s appointment of Aharon.

May Hashem guide us so that we each understand our proper role, and may He assist us so that we fulfill it appropriately.

Gut Shabbos

Friday, June 10, 2011

Parashas Behaalos'cha

In this week’s parashah, the Torah tells us how a group of people, “the rabble” decided that the mann Hashem was providing was not good enough; they craved a richer menu, like the one they imagined they ate in Egypt during the time they were there (of course, don’t bother confusing them with the fact that they were enslaved and barely being fed).

The Torah then digresses (11:7-9) to describe the properties of the mann: וְהַמָּן כִּזְרַע גַּד הוּא וְעֵינוֹ כְּעֵין הַבְּדֹלַח: שָׁטוּ הָעָם וְלָקְטוּ וְטָחֲנוּ בָרֵחַיִם אוֹ דָכוּ בַּמְּדֹכָה וּבִשְּׁלוּ בַּפָּרוּר וְעָשׂוּ אֹתוֹ עֻגוֹת וְהָיָה טַעְמוֹ כְּטַעַם לְשַׁד הַשָּׁמֶן: וּבְרֶדֶת הַטַּל עַל־הַמַּחֲנֶה לָיְלָה יֵרֵד הַמָּן עָלָיו:, And the mann was like corriander seed, and its appearance was like that of crystal. The nation would go about and gather it, and they ground it in a mill or crushed it with a mortar and they would cook it in a pot and make it into cakes, and it’s taste was like that of dough kneaded with oil. And when the dew would fall on the encampment at night, the mann would descend on it.

Ibn Ezra points out that the Torah is explaining the absurdity of the complaint: The people were being provided with food that was easy to come by (it fell all over and was white), clean (it fell on the dew), convenient to take home (the seeds were small), easy to prepare in a variety of ways and tasty.

The most obvious lesson to us it to appreciate the countless blessings Hashem showers upon us, and to notice and thank Him for the many “hidden details” within those blessings.

There is another important lesson as well: When we do something for another person, we should make sure to do it in a way that it most helpful to that person, anticipating their needs and addressing each aspect of how we can help them most completely.

The Torah tells us that Hashem even went beyond the functional:וְעֵינוֹ כְּעֵין הַבְּדֹלַח, its appearance was like that of crystal, inviting and enticing. We should learn from His example, to do chessed with chessed, to truly live וְאָהַבְתָּ לְרֵעֲךָ כָּמוֹךָ in the fullest way possible.

In this zechus, we will certainly again merit to experience, visibly, Hashem’s boundless love for Klal Yisrael.

Gut Shabbos.

Monday, June 6, 2011

A Quick Thought on Shavuos

Many have remarked on the apparent irony that unlike other yamim tovim, Shavuos, when we celebrate our receiving the Torah, does not have any specific mitzvos.


Even more, the gemara (Pesachim 68b) tells us that some maintain that there is no obligation for a person to enjoy delightful meals on the festivals – with the exceptions of Shavuos and Purim, when all agree that a person must enjoy himself. Why must one enjoy physical delights on Shavuos? The gemara answers that it is because it is the day the Torah was given to Klal Yisrael.


Is that logical? Wouldn’t this be the day that calls for complete spirituality? Shouldn’t it be a day completely devoted to prayer, study and the performance of special mitzvos?


The Torah is telling us that the answer is a resounding No!


We don’t commemorate receiving the Torah through some special act. We relive receiving it through every act. Torah is not just ceremonies and observances. Torah is not limited to eating matzah or lighting the Menorah. Torah is supposed to guide everything we do each day. The objective of the Jew is to live Torah.


So that is how we mark this special occasion: By doing nothing unique to this day. By insisting that we not only daven, sing praises to Hashem, and study, but that we enjoy food and drink. Because Torah is more than ritual, it is meant infuse our every action with sanctity; to make our gustatory delight an act of Divine worship.


May we all merit to a renewed personal kabbalas haTorah this Shavuos, and may we yet merit to meet as we are oleh regel together, this very Yom Tov.


Gut Yom Tov.